Archive for the 'Other Cities' Category

Streetcar projects opening in 2016

Kansas City joins the small group of cities with operating streetcar systems this year, while a few other cities have new lines that have seen significant delays in their original opening dates. Here’s what 2016 holds:

DC Streetcar on H Street

H Street, Washington, DC (Early 2016) – OPENED FEB. 27, 2016

New leadership and a peer review has helped get this bad boy back in shape and a January opening seems very possible. Most transit projects survive bad reputations shortly after they’re operating, but it will take a long time for this one to recoup having been under construction since 2009.

  • Length: 2.4 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic, both curb- and center-running
  • Vehicles: Modern (Inekon, Oregon Iron Works)
  • Peak headway: 15 minutes, no Sunday service
  • Fare: $1 (free initially)
  • Major transit connections: Union Station (subway, commuter rail, Amtrak), local bus
  • Funding: Local

Seattle streetcar

First Hill, Seattle, WA (Early 2016) – OPENED JAN. 23, 2016

We said it last year: This project is one to watch due to the combined bike and streetcar facility on a busy commercial street. Having seen the infrastructure up close, it’s a testament to a city’s focus on bike safety. Both Seattle and DC projects were on last year’s opening list.

  • Length: 2.5 miles (Expansions planned)
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic, curb-running
  • Vehicles: Modern (Inekon)
  • Peak headway: 10 minutes
  • Fare: $2.25
  • Major transit connections: Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel (local bus and light rail), new light rail station (
  • Funding: Local

Streetcar #801

Main Street, Kansas City, MO (Spring 2016) – OPENS MAY 6, 2016

Our baby finally opens this Spring! After decades of false starts with light rail, the little starter line succeeds.

  • Length: 2 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic, curb-running
  • Vehicles: Modern (CAF)
  • Peak headway: 10 minutes
  • Fare: Free
  • Major transit connections: 11th/12th street “transit emphasis corridor”, 3rd & Grand transit center, Union Station/Crown Center (Amtrak, local bus)
  • Funding: Federal, local

Loyola streetcar

Rampart Street, New Orleans, LA (3rd Quarter 2016)

One of the few cities melding new and old streetcar implementations, New Orleans is home of the oldest line (St. Charles) and soon one of the newest (Rampart). All lines converge at historic Canal Street, which is a wonder to watch at all times of day. This new line will serve the French Quarter more directly.

  • Length: 1.6 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic, center-running
  • Vehicles: Heritage replica
  • Peak headway: 15 minutes (estimated, based on existing service)
  • Fare: $1.25
  • Major transit connection: Existing streetcar and bus routes via Canal Street, Union Passenger Terminal (Amtrak)
  • Funding: Local

Cincinnati streetcar

Downtown, Cincinnati, OH (September 2016)

Our streetcar brethren — we’re sharing a vehicle contract — has held their September 2016 opening out for a long time, and it looks like they’re going to make it. Perhaps the most caustic political meddling in a transit project outside of Milwaukee (just Google them both).

  • Length: 3.6 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic, curb-running
  • Vehicles: Modern (CAF)
  • Peak headway: 12 minutes
  • Fare: $1
  • Major transit connection:
  • Funding: Federal, local

Loop Trolley rendering

Delmar Loop, St. Louis, MO (Late 2016)

Despite having received a stern warning from the feds, it looks like the Loop streetcar (sorry, we don’t use the “T” word here) will at least finish construction this year, if not start operating. It helps to already have all of your vehicles on the ground.

  • Length: 2.2 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic along curb and dedicated median-running
  • Vehicles: Vintage
  • Peak headway: 20 minutes
  • Fare: $1
  • Major transit connection: Two light rail stations (Forest Park and Delmar)
  • Funding: Federal, local


Oak Cliff Extension, Dallas, TX (Late 2016)

The initial segment is one of the smallest lines in operation (1.6 miles), but that was just to get the off-wire ball rolling (it’s the first in the US to operate a segment without overhead wires). This next phase will extend further into the Bishop Arts District.

  • Length: 0.7 miles
  • Implementation: Mixed traffic with off-wire segments
  • Vehicles: Modern (Brookfield)
  • Peak headway: 20 minutes
  • Fare: Free
  • Major transit connection: Union Station (Amtrak, commuter rail, light rail)

Projects starting construction this year include Milwaukee and Fort Lauderdale.

Comments are off for this post

Streetcar projects opening in 2015

While construction on Kansas City’s starter streetcar line will be complete in 2015, service won’t actually begin until 2016. A few other cities will open new lines or extensions this calendar year, pending final testing and safety certification:

H Street Line, Washington, DC (January)


Underway as both a streetscape and transit project since 2009, DC’s first streetcar line is a standout because it was done without federal funding; most of Portland and Seattle were built without explicit federal funding, but many of the newer lines (including a recent Portland expansion) have received competitive grants or New/Small Starts funds.

  • Length: 2.4 miles (22-to-37 miles planned)
  • Vehicles: Modern (Inekon, Oregon Iron Works)
  • Peak headway: 10 minutes
  • Fare: $1
  • Major transit connection: Union Station (subway, commuter rail, Amtrak)
  • Funding: Local

Gold Line Phase 1, Charlotte, NC (Spring)


The Gold Line will open as early as March and connect the existing Blue Line light rail line that opened in 2007 to neighborhoods. Phase 2 is expected to start construction in 2016.

  • Length: 1.5 miles (10 miles planned)
  • Vehicles: Vintage (initially)
  • Peak headway: 10 minutes
  • Fare: TBD
  • Major transit connection: Charlotte Transit Center (light rail, local bus)
  • Funding: Federal, local

Oak Cliff Streetcar, Dallas, TX (Spring)


America’s first off wire modern streetcar will connect downtown Dallas with the Oak Cliff neighborhood across the historic Trinity River bridge (which originally carried streetcars). A 1-mile loop extension of the existing M-Line vintage streetcar line is also planned to open in 2015.

  • Length: 1.6 miles (Expansions planned)
  • Vehicles: Modern (Brookfield)
  • Peak headway: 20 minutes
  • Fare: TBD
  • Major transit connections: Union Station (light rail, commuter rail, local bus, Amtrak)
  • Funding: Federal, local

South Loop, Portland, OR (September)


A new car-free river crossing will complete the full loop of both sides of the Willamette River originally envisioned in the late ’80s. The cable-stayed bridge will share space for buses, streetcars, light rail, bikes, and pedestrians — the first of its kind.

  • Length: 1.3 miles (Expansions planned)
  • Vehicles: Modern (Inekon, Skoda, Oregon Iron Works)
  • Peak headway: 12 minutes
  • Fare: $1
  • Major transit connection: New Milwaukie light rail line
  • Funding: Federal, state, local

First Hill Line, Seattle, WA (Fall)


The first streetcar line to incorporate a significant bike facility in the same corridor also stands out for lack of federal funding. Eventually a new Central Connector will join the First Hill line with the existing South Lake Union line.

  • Length: 2.5 miles (Expansions planned)
  • Vehicles: Modern (Inekon)
  • Peak headway: 10 minutes
  • Fare: TBD
  • Major transit connection: Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel (south), new light rail station (north)
  • Funding: Local

Atlanta opened December 30, 2014 and Tucson opened July 25, 2014, rounding out last year’s new systems. Both used federal funding, modern vehicles (Siemens and Oregon Iron Works, respectively), and are already planning extensions.

Comments are off for this post

What it's like to ride a DMU

Westside Express Service, Portland, OR. Flickr image by DarkStarPDX.

One of the details in Mike Sanders’ rapid_rail_presentation is the proposal to use diesel multiple units (DMUs) — a passenger rail vehicle propelled by an onboard diesel engine. This is unique because most commuter rail operators run conventional locomotives pulling (or pushing) conventional passenger rail coaches. Regional examples of conventional commuter rail are Chicago’s Metra, Dallas’ TRE, Minneapolis’ Northstar, and Nashville’s Music City Star).

DMUs are easily confused with electrically-powered light rail vehicles and modern streetcars, and the difference is slight: other than the powertrain and the lack of overhead wires, DMUs that run on freight rail tracks must conform to strict crash regulations. This, unfortunately, makes them heavy. At the same time a DMU can be (arguably) cheaper to operate on routes with light demand.

To make matters even more confusing, one of the few places in America where DMUs operate — New Jersey Transit’s River Line — is actually called a light rail line. We can’t even tell you that the terms “commuter rail” and “light rail” are even 100% distinct, since systems bearing either label can perform similar goals — transporting commuters to and from the urban core — over similar distances. A good rule of thumb, however, is that light rail better serves urban environments with closer stops; commuter rail better serves suburbs with stops spaced further apart… regardless of the vehicle type or fuel source.

We had a chance to ride a DMU transit route on a recent trip to Portland. The TriMet‘s Westside Express Service has been in operation since 2009 and serves four suburbs. We’d like to be the one to tell you that this route was trouble-free to construct and operate, but that would be a lie.

Regardless, the day we rode WES it was glitch-free, on-time, full of passengers, and included in our $4.75 all-day transit pass (unusual for US commuter rail). The sensation was a mash-up of riding any other train with the subtle reminder that a large diesel engine was underfoot (and releasing particulate pollution, although not nearly as much as if all riders had chosen to drive congested I-5 instead). Bikes were onboard — you can’t really avoid them in Portland, even if you tried — and the easy transfer from light rail, plush seats, and a friendly conductor made our brief trip a pleasant experience.

As for the Sanders proposal, the reliance on DMUs for all-day service on multiple lines would indeed make it unique in all of North America, perhaps the world. The company that built the WES vehicles has reincorporated in Ohio — with a Missouri-based partner, no less — and plans to resume production soon. Hopefully they will engineer improvements that make the vehicles more reliable for daily service.

1 comment

Why Portland actually means something for KC

After years of struggling with a stubborn Bush administration that refused to consider streetcars a valid form of urban transit, Portland and the Federal Transportation Administration announced a reversal last week.

The flood gates are now open, and that flood includes Kansas City’s streetcar proposal. Finally, Portland actually means something for Kansas City.

Cities across the country have been actively planning modern streetcar lines, mostly with the intent of reviving their urban cores. Moving more transit riders is still critical, but secondary to the economic development motive. While the previous administration dithered, cities moved ahead and proved them wrong; Portland, the darling of new urbanism, was at the forefront.

The money for Portland comes from the FTA’s Small Starts program, which also is funding our Troost MAX BRT line. Federal funding requests must be less than $75 million; Kansas City’s downtown streetcar proposal clocks in at $60 million.

While the federal transportation funding situation is in flux — and will continue to be throughout next year — the viability of a federal match, and potential for an early kick-start via the regional TIGER application, enhance our prospects significantly.

In short, it’s Kansas City’s best shot for initiating light rail service. We discourage readers from signing Clay Chastain’s latest petition, or voting for it should he successfully garner enough signatures. Forcing the city to deal with yet another legal quagmire would distract from the effort to move a real plan forward. If anyone thinks the city would every actually try to implement one of Chastain’s plan, we have a gondola to sell you.


Commuter rail before (or after) light rail?

Our last post about the regional commuter rail proposal unleashed questions about how the plan relates to the downtown streetcar proposal, and whether (or if) one is needed before the other. We decided to simply lay out some data so you can formulate your own conclusion.

The table below represents America’s “new rail cities” — metropolitan areas that built new rail infrastructure after the expansion of highway capacity and the rise of the private auto. This excludes cities that never dismantled their urban or commuter rail infrastructure in the 1950s (Boston, Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and San Francisco). This provides a more balanced comparison to what KC is up against when implementing services from scratch.

Urban Rail refers to any rail line that is designed to serve an urban core with frequent, all-day service (subways, elevateds, streetcars, light rail). Commuter Rail refers to any rail line that connects outlying suburbs with the central business district with less frequent service focused primarily on rush hours.

The year corresponds to the initial year of operation. Fully-funded rail lines under construction are listed; BRT lines are not.

Metro Area Urban Rail Commuter Rail
Atlanta, Georgia 1979 N/A
Albuquerque, New Mexico N/A 2006
Buffalo, New York 1984 N/A
Charlotte, North Carolina 2007 N/A
Dallas, Texas 1996 1996
Denver, Colorado 1994 2015
Houston, Texas 2004 N/A
Los Angeles, California 1990 1992
Miami, Florida 1984 1987
Minneapolis, Minnesota 2004 2009
Nashville, Tennessee N/A 2006
New Haven, Connecticut N/A 1990
Norfolk, Virginia 2010 N/A
Portland, Oregon 1986 2009
Sacramento, California 1987 N/A
Salt Lake City, Utah 1999 2008
San Diego, California 1981 1995
Seattle, Washington 2009 2003
St. Louis, Missouri 1993 N/A
Washington, DC 1976 1984

Round-up: Peer cities & modern streetcars


Other cities applying for TIGER streetcar funds

In light of yesterday’s ordinance supporting a regional TIGER application that includes $6 million for funding of a downtown streetcar, we’ve been keeping tabs on the following cities that are making similar applications for TIGER stimulus funds:

  • Salt Lake City is applying for $35 million in TIGER funds (which augment a local match, unlike KC) to fund a two-mile streetcar line connecting a light rail station and the Sugar House business district.
  • Atlanta has funded a $600,000 study and is teaming up with the local transit agency to apply for as much as $300 million in TIGER funds (the state-wide cap) to kick-start a two-line streetcar system in the “Peachtree Corridor” connecting downtown and midtown. See
  • Boise is applying for $40 million in TIGER funds to pay for a 16-block downtown streetcar route that could cost up to $65 million. Operations would be paid for through special fees assessed on adjacent property owners. See
  • Dallas is applying for $48 million in TIGER funds for a three-mile streetcar line connecting Dallas Union Station and the Oak Cliff Arts District. See Dallas already has a privately-run vintage streetcar line that serves the Uptown neighborhood (and several light rail lines, of course).
  • Fort Worth is also reportedly applying for a similar amount in TIGER funds to jump-start a multi-line streetcar system.

Kansas City’s $6 million request won’t cover the entire project cost, of course, but will likely pay for any upfront design and engineering studies that will be required. KCATA estimate the cost of two-mile route connecting the River Market and Crown Center to be about $100-150 million. A new revenue stream would be needed for operating costs of about $2 million annually, which could be covered by a TDD assessed on adjacent property owners (who stand to gain the most from the system).


Round-up: Buy American edition

To celebrate our country’s birth, we present a handful of patriotic transit developments:

Enjoy the holiday and stay safe!

1 comment

New Chastain petition drive starts Monday

After a failed attempt at working directly with the Parks Board, Clay Chastain is starting another light rail petition initiative. He will be gathering signatures from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday at Union Station. Laugh if you must, but Chastain is the only person who’s actually doing something about light rail right now. What better way to keep the city’s feet to the fire than sign the petition again?

No gondolas this time — which we feel was a pretty good idea… ever walked from Union Station to Liberty Memorial? Yeah, didn’t think so — but the electric buses are back, fueled this time by wind turbines on the riverfront. And if you think that’s koo-koo, check out Oklahoma City’s plan again.

And even though the Missouri Court of Appeals struck down Chastain’s legal challenge from the last initiative, he’s still threatening to take that one to the Missouri Supreme Court.


Senate takes first step on transpo bill rewrite

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (WV) and Sen. Frank Lautenberg (NJ) have created a marker for the next federal transportation bill being drafted by Rep. Jim Oberstar (OR). The marker dictates that the next bill:

  • Reduce national per-capita motor vehicle miles traveled on an annual basis;
  • Cut national motor vehicle-related fatalities in half by 2030;
  • Cut national surface transportation-generated carbon emissions by 40 percent by 2030;
  • Reduce surface transportation delays per capita on an annual basis;
  • Get 20 percent more critical surface-transportation assets into a state of good repair by 2030;
  • Increase the total usage of public transit, intercity passenger rail and non-motorized transport on an annual basis.

What affect does this have on Kansas City’s chances for light rail? Any renewed emphasis on public transit usage, reducing VMT, or cutting carbon emissions would support an increase in funding for urban rail transit, which would in turn help KC’s chances. Most vehicle trips are within cities, so that’s where you get the most bang for the buck (second place would probably be high speed rail in popular 100-500 mile corridors). Current funding formulas would need to change dramatically since they are now focused more on commuting trips and the cost/benefit of serving them with a particular mode.

There have been rumblings, of course, that this is not a top legislative priority this session. We remain hopeful that will not be the case.

As a reminder, KC has a completed Alternatives Analysis for the “north-south” corridor along Main Street. All it takes now is the political will to go back to voters for a new, dedicated funding mechanism or the creation of a public-private partnership (see Portland Streetcar and Detroit M1-Rail).

Oh, and did we forget to mention that Oklahoma City is putting a light rail before voters in December? Yes, Oklahoma City.

1 comment

Next Page »